How is flexibility measured in alternative SFT tests if a sit-and-reach box isn’t available?

Flexibility is commonly assessed without a sit-and-reach box by reaching for a predetermined distance marker on the floor. This method allows for an objective measurement of how far a person can stretch toward their toes or a specified point while seated with their legs extended. The focus on a set distance offers a clear benchmark for evaluation, making it easier to track improvements over time.

Utilizing a distance marker provides a practical alternative that can be easily implemented in various settings, ensuring that flexibility can still be measured effectively in the absence of specialized equipment. This approach allows participants to be evaluated relative to a standard, promoting accurate and consistent results in flexibility assessments.

In contrast, performing a series of yoga stretches may enhance flexibility but would not provide a quantifiable measurement. Likewise, using a standard exercise mat does not inherently create a method for measuring flexibility, nor does assessing balance during a standing reach directly evaluate flexibility in the same way that reaching for a marker would. Therefore, the first option remains the most logical and appropriate method for measuring flexibility in alternative SFT tests.